Reposted: https://www.facebook.com/udoisohm/posts/pfbid02zvxr8vtsikrN2B3xYJzeAyuCC9qrMdWmqjX1SfmUkYB2pVzjMvburyDxT5CoHj9Wl?__cft__[0]=AZUpae1uxSb1eLoNwEsT1FWbNQfLq92F5_EvU3_P84E__mARGfe9VP4eoutlpqoOnex6KO3Z_2w_pEy1l7aKHLCtY45Y-1pZAyhUho_2DgMz-A&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R
https://www.facebook.com/udoisohm/posts/pfbid02zvxr8vtsikrN2B3xYJzeAyuCC9qrMdWmqjX1SfmUkYB2pVzjMvburyDxT5CoHj9Wl?__cft__[0]=AZUpae1uxSb1eLoNwEsT1FWbNQfLq92F5_EvU3_P84E__mARGfe9VP4eoutlpqoOnex6KO3Z_2w_pEy1l7aKHLCtY45Y-1pZAyhUho_2DgMz-A&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R ↗As a thesis examiner, I always run a “sneak peek” to get a preview of a thesis. Here are seven things that I usually check before I read a full thesis (and they are always in this order).
Reference list The first thing I check is the reference list. Why? The reference list, to me, is the face of a PhD student. I can judge whether the student is serious or not through the reference list. The reference style has a predictive power of the student’s strength/weakness. If the student can strictly follow an established referencing convention (like APA 7th edition), I can tell that they are hardworking, meticulous and serious. If not, I can predict that reading the thesis will be potentially a headache, which is usually the case.
Thesis title Thesis title should be concise and self explanatory. When I look at the title at first glance, I should be able to predict the direction and narration of the study. If the title is too broad and the contexts are not provided, I can sense an issue in the thesis.
Abstract The abstract should be able to provide a teaser of the whole thesis. If the abstract is well-structured (introduction, methodology, findings, conclusion), follows the word limit, and contains no grammatical errors, I can sigh with relief, knowing that the thesis will be a good read.
Table of contents The table of contents should ease readers’ navigation of the whole thesis. If it is not well organised and contains a lot of formatting errors, I should be prepared for the worst in the thesis.
Research questions Research questions are the heart of a thesis. They should be clearly written and reflect the literature review, the methodology and the findings. If the heart is problematic, I can predict that the thesis might be sick.
Conceptual/theoretical frameworks Conceptual/theoretical frameworks are the blueprint of a thesis. They usually contain visuals that show connection among variables/constructs. If the visuals are messy, I would hold my breath and probably delay my reading.
Appendices In the appendices, I usually look for the existence of detailed research instruments (questionnaires, interview protocols, observation checklists, etc.). I will cross-check these items in the research methodology chapter. If the methods are not in order, I will pray in silence that I would not suffer reading the thesis.
After all of these preliminary checkpoints, I will take a deep breath and start reading the full thesis, which is usually not in a chronological order (I will go back and forth between chapters). It usually takes a few weeks for me to complete the reading. God bless thesis writers.
Credit: Dr. Hilma Hamzah
Have some thoughts, discussion or feedback on this post?
▸ What is webmention? How to send interactions!
webmention with this page.
You can also mention this URL on any website that supports WebMention.
Have you written a response to this post? Let me know the URL:Don't have WebMention? Use Comment Parade!
Comments section coming soon. For now, send a webmention or email.